<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ReelSmart.com &#187; Featured</title>
	<link>http://www.reelsmart.com</link>
	<description>Video, Technology, Digital LifeStyle, Macintosh Tips, and Opinions</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 02:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Review: iPod classic and the new iPod nano</title>
		<link>http://www.reelsmart.com/2007/09/14/review-ipod-classic-and-the-new-ipod-nano/</link>
		<comments>http://www.reelsmart.com/2007/09/14/review-ipod-classic-and-the-new-ipod-nano/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Antonucci</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reelsmart.com/2007/09/14/review-ipod-classic-and-the-new-ipod-nano/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have received my black 160GB iPod classic ($349) I ordered. I have put it thru its paces the last few days including a long 6-plus hours of drive time in my mini-van yesterday. I also bought a 8GB iPod nano in black on Wednesday at the local Apple Store.

With both these units next to each other, it looks like Apple should have said "Honey I Shrank the iPod" as in this generation of new iPods there is a true feature compatibility between Apple's hard drive full sized iPod and the flash based smaller thinner iPod nano.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.reelsmart.com/2007/09/14/review-ipod-classic-and-the-new-ipod-nano/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
